If you are a founder in Tunis or Istanbul plotting your expansion into Europe, the default advice for the last decade has been simple: "Go to Berlin for the market size, or Amsterdam for the English-speaking ease."
For a long time, that was good advice. But in 2025, the calculus has shifted.
France has aggressively re-engineered its entire state apparatus to become not just "startup-friendly," but structurally superior for R&D-heavy companies. With the rise of the AI multiplier effect in Paris and the massive fiscal power of the Crédit d'Impôt Recherche (CIR), France is no longer just the "lifestyle" option—it is arguably the most rational financial choice for technical founders.
This is not to say Germany or the Netherlands are bad choices. Germany remains the industrial engine of Europe, and the Netherlands offers an unmatched logistics and trading gateway. But as a SaaS or AI founder from MENA, you are not building a factory or a shipping port. You are building IP.
This guide breaks down the strategic choice between the "Big Three" EU hubs based on what actually matters to your P&L and your personal stability: Cash flow (Tax/Incentives), Residency (Visas), and Talent.
When you incorporate in the EU, your burn rate increases immediately. The smartest founders choose a jurisdiction that effectively subsidizes their development costs. This is where the three countries diverge sharply.
France offers the Crédit d'Impôt Recherche (CIR), widely considered the most generous R&D tax incentive in Europe.
The Dutch system is sophisticated but focuses on lowering taxes on profits, which helps later-stage companies more than seed-stage ones.
Germany was late to the game, introducing its R&D tax credit in 2020.
Winner for Deeptech/SaaS: France. The immediate cash-flow impact of the CIR is unbeaten.
For a founder from Tunisia or Turkey, your residency status is a business risk. You cannot afford to have your immigration status tied to a 12-month renewal cycle.
France has streamlined the French Tech Visa into the "gold standard" for non-EU teams.
The Dutch Startup Visa is famous but restrictive.
Germany does not have a dedicated "Startup Visa" branded as cleanly as the others.
Winner for Stability: France. 4 years vs. 1 year is a strategic no-brainer.
Where can you build the best team for the lowest cost?
For a Tunisian founder, France offers a unique hybrid model. You can establish your HQ in Paris for sales/marketing while keeping your engineering team in Tunis. The time zone is identical, the flight is 2 hours, and the legal frameworks for cross-border invoicing are mature. Germany and Netherlands lack this deep historical/legal integration with the Maghreb, making "nearshoring" slightly more complex administratively.
In 2024/2025, France has become the undisputed EU capital for AI. With massive rounds for companies like Mistral AI and "H Company," Paris is attracting a disproportionate amount of deeptech capital (35% of all funds raised in France in 2024 went to AI). If you are building LLMs, Generative AI, or algorithmic SaaS, investors in Paris are actively hunting for you.
Germany remains the leader in total deal volume and B2B SaaS/Transportation tech. If your startup serves the automotive, manufacturing, or heavy industry sectors ("Industry 4.0"), Berlin or Munich puts you closer to your customers than Paris does.
The Netherlands punches above its weight in Fintech, Logistics, and Agtech. It is a trading nation. If your startup relies on cross-border payments or physical supply chains, Amsterdam is unrivaled.
This is the factor no spreadsheet will show you, but it matters for your mental health and speed of integration.
For Francophone founders (Tunisia, Morocco, Lebanon), France offers immediate linguistic integration. You can navigate the tax office, negotiate a lease, and pitch a VC in your native or second language from Day 1. In Germany or the Netherlands, while business is done in English, life is done in German or Dutch. Dealing with a German tax letter (Finanzamt) when you don't speak German is a significant operational drag.
For Turkish founders, Germany has a massive, established Turkish diaspora (over 3 million people). This provides a "soft landing" network for housing, advice, and community that France and the Netherlands cannot match at the same scale.
| Feature | France 🇫🇷 | Germany 🇩🇪 | Netherlands 🇳🇱 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corp Tax | ~25% | ~30% (varies by city) | 19% - 25.8% |
| Top Incentive | CIR (30% R&D Credit) | Research Allowance (25%) | Innovation Box (9% tax on IP profit) |
| Founder Visa | 4 Years (French Tech) | 1-3 Years (Self-Employed) | 1 Year (Startup Visa) |
| Top Sectors | AI, SaaS, Deeptech, Luxury | B2B, Auto, Fintech | Logistics, Fintech, Agri |
| Talent Cost | Moderate (High social charges) | High | Highest |
| Best For... | R&D heavy startups & Francophones | B2B / Industrial & Turkish founders | Trading / Logistics & English-first teams |
There is no "best" country, only the best country for your specific constraints.
For MENA founders in 2025, France’s combination of the French Tech Visa speed and CIR cash-flow benefits often makes it the superior choice for early-stage technology ventures.
Still modeling the costs?
We can run a simulation of your "burn rate" in Paris vs. Berlin based on your current team size.
Yes. This is the most common model we see. You establish a French SAS for the HQ (sales, IP, investment) and sign a service contract with your entity in Tunis/Istanbul. France’s legal system is very familiar with this cross-border structure.
No. It is for "innovative" startups. You need to be selected by a partner incubator. While many incubators look for VC-potential, bootstrapped profitable SaaS companies are regularly accepted if they show innovation.
To get the visa? No. To do business? Increasingly, no—the startup ecosystem (Station F, etc.) operates largely in English. However, navigating daily life (housing, schools) is significantly easier with basic French.
The Netherlands and France are comparable (often 3-7 days for digital incorporation). Germany is notoriously slower due to the requirement for physical notary appointments and complex banking compliance.
You don’t usually "move" it; you create a French subsidiary or a holding structure. France has excellent treaties to avoid double taxation, allowing you to create a French entity that becomes the operational HQ while keeping your original entity if necessary.
What is your pick?
Are you Team French Tech 🇫🇷, Team Berlin 🇩🇪, or Team Amsterdam 🇳🇱?
Reply and tell us which factor (Tax, Visa, or Market) wins for you.